haskell - Can't understand result of Monad >> application -


operation >> description following:

sequentially compose 2 actions, discarding value produced first, sequencing operators (such semicolon) in imperative languages.

here example confuses me:

> ([1] ++ [2]) >> ([2] ++ [3]) [2,3,2,3]

i'm expecting list [2,3] result of right part of expression. how can result of [2,3,2,3] explained?

(>>) default defined as

a >> b = >>= (\_ -> b)

so value being ignored a in given monadic value m a. type of >>= specialised list is:

(>>=) :: [a] -> (a -> [b]) -> [b]

l >>= f invokes f each element of list l product list of lists concatenated.

e.g.

[1,2] >>= (\i -> [i, -i]) > [1,-1,2,-2]

ignoring each input element , returning value [2,3] result in n copies of list [2,3] input list of length n

e.g.

[1] >>= (\_ -> [2,3]) > [2,3]  [1,2] >>= (\_ -> [2,3]) > [2,3,2,3]

this second example equivalent ([1] ++ [2]) >> ([2] ++ [3]) in question.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

jOOQ update returning clause with Oracle -

according http://www.jooq.org/doc/3.8/manual/sql-building/sql-statements/update-statement/ jooq doesn't support returning clause in update statements databases except firebird , postgres. does know, still correct oracle jooq? according oracle's documentation, oracle db supports returning clase delete, insert, or update statements. incorrect manual you're right - manual wrong , should fixed: https://github.com/jooq/jooq/issues/5470 single row update returning jooq 3.8 added support single row update .. returning statements. internally, uses callablestatement , pl/sql block of form: begin update "my_table" set "my_table"."column" = 'xyz' "my_table"."id" = 1 returning "my_table"."id", "my_table"."column" ?, ?; ? := sql%rowcount; end; the relevant issue is: https://github.com/jooq/jooq/issues/5190 multi row update returning a...
Read more

java - Warning equals/hashCode on @Data annotation lombok with inheritance -

i have entity inherits other. on other hand, i'm using lombok project reduce boilerplate code, put @data annotation. annotation @data inheritance produces next warning: generating equals/hashcode implementation without call superclass, though class not extend java.lang.object. if intentional, add '@equalsandhashcode(callsuper=false)' type. is advisable add annotation @equalsandhashcode (callsuper = true) or @equalsandhashcode (callsuper = false) ? if not added, 1 callsuper=false or callsuper=true ? the default value false . 1 if don't specify , ignore warning. yes, recommended add @equalsandhashcode annotation on @data annotated classes extend else object. cannot tell if need true or false , depends on class hierarchy, , need examined on case-by-case basis. however, project or package, can configure in lombok.config call super methods if not direct subclass of object. lombok.equalsandhashcode.callsuper = call for configuration system ...
Read more

java - BasicPathUsageException: Cannot join to attribute of basic type -

i using java 8 jpa (hibernate 5.2.1). have clause works perfectly, until introduce clause make use foreign key table values too. i getting following error: basicpathusageexception: cannot join attribute of basic type i think problem related fact have join table, , not sure how create join using join table. employee - employee_category - category model (employee.java): @manytomany(cascade = cascadetype.all, fetch=fetchtype.eager) @jointable ( name="employee_category", joincolumns={ @joincolumn(name="emp_id", referencedcolumnname="id") }, inversejoincolumns={ @joincolumn(name="cat_id", referencedcolumnname="id") } ) private set<category> categories; model (category.java): @id private string id; jpa when introduce following code, fails error above (i think problem new piece of code): join<t, category> category = from.join("id"); predicates.add(criteriabuilder.like(category....
Read more