javascript - What would be the best practice implementing Google Adwords Dynamic Remarketing Tag with AngularJS -


i trying dynamically populate google adwords remarketing tag. how google code looks like:

<script type="text/javascript"> var google_tag_params = { dynx_itemid: 'replace_with_value', dynx_itemid2: 'replace_with_value', dynx_pagetype: 'replace_with_value', dynx_totalvalue: 'replace_with_value', }; </script> <script type="text/javascript"> /* <![cdata[ */ var google_conversion_id = {converion-id}; // replace {converion-id} conversion id var google_custom_params = window.google_tag_params; var google_remarketing_only = true; /* ]]> */ </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="//www.googleadservices.com/pagead/conversion.js"> </script> <noscript> <div style="display:inline;"> <!-- replace {converion-id} conversion id --> <img height="1" width="1" style="border-style:none;" alt="" src="//googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/viewthroughconversion/{converion-id}/?value=0&amp;guid=on&amp;script=0"/>  </div> </noscript>

on each page loaded dynamically replace dynx_itemid variable through angular. love hear thoughts it. i've found following lib https://github.com/mooyoul/angulartics-google-adwords-remarketing-tag supports remarketing tag , not dynamic one.

thanks

eventually ended creating angular module gets 3 parameters conversion label, value , currency , called wherever needed

angular.module('project.google.model', [ /*google remarketing module*/ ]).service('googlemodel', [function () {     var model = this;     model.trackconversion = function (label, value, currency) {          window.google_trackconversion({             google_conversion_id: xxxxxxx,             google_conversion_language: "en",             google_conversion_format: "3",             google_conversion_color: "ffffff",             google_conversion_label: label,             google_conversion_value: value,             google_conversion_currency: currency,             google_remarketing_only: false         });     } }]);

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

jOOQ update returning clause with Oracle -

according http://www.jooq.org/doc/3.8/manual/sql-building/sql-statements/update-statement/ jooq doesn't support returning clause in update statements databases except firebird , postgres. does know, still correct oracle jooq? according oracle's documentation, oracle db supports returning clase delete, insert, or update statements. incorrect manual you're right - manual wrong , should fixed: https://github.com/jooq/jooq/issues/5470 single row update returning jooq 3.8 added support single row update .. returning statements. internally, uses callablestatement , pl/sql block of form: begin update "my_table" set "my_table"."column" = 'xyz' "my_table"."id" = 1 returning "my_table"."id", "my_table"."column" ?, ?; ? := sql%rowcount; end; the relevant issue is: https://github.com/jooq/jooq/issues/5190 multi row update returning a...
Read more

java - Warning equals/hashCode on @Data annotation lombok with inheritance -

i have entity inherits other. on other hand, i'm using lombok project reduce boilerplate code, put @data annotation. annotation @data inheritance produces next warning: generating equals/hashcode implementation without call superclass, though class not extend java.lang.object. if intentional, add '@equalsandhashcode(callsuper=false)' type. is advisable add annotation @equalsandhashcode (callsuper = true) or @equalsandhashcode (callsuper = false) ? if not added, 1 callsuper=false or callsuper=true ? the default value false . 1 if don't specify , ignore warning. yes, recommended add @equalsandhashcode annotation on @data annotated classes extend else object. cannot tell if need true or false , depends on class hierarchy, , need examined on case-by-case basis. however, project or package, can configure in lombok.config call super methods if not direct subclass of object. lombok.equalsandhashcode.callsuper = call for configuration system ...
Read more

java - BasicPathUsageException: Cannot join to attribute of basic type -

i using java 8 jpa (hibernate 5.2.1). have clause works perfectly, until introduce clause make use foreign key table values too. i getting following error: basicpathusageexception: cannot join attribute of basic type i think problem related fact have join table, , not sure how create join using join table. employee - employee_category - category model (employee.java): @manytomany(cascade = cascadetype.all, fetch=fetchtype.eager) @jointable ( name="employee_category", joincolumns={ @joincolumn(name="emp_id", referencedcolumnname="id") }, inversejoincolumns={ @joincolumn(name="cat_id", referencedcolumnname="id") } ) private set<category> categories; model (category.java): @id private string id; jpa when introduce following code, fails error above (i think problem new piece of code): join<t, category> category = from.join("id"); predicates.add(criteriabuilder.like(category....
Read more